Idaho Families – What You Need to Know
BY Isaiah Frizzell
This is the introduction to a forthcoming series of bipartisan articles on the misuse of federal organizations and local law enforcement to target citizens.
Eric Parker, Constitutional Conservative and occasional populist candidate for Senate, has returned from a whirlwind trip to Washington, D.C., after a series of highly successful meetings with Senators Crapo and Risch, bipartisan staff members and policymakers. A general goal of the 20 or so meetings was to expand the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government’s inquiries from ‘the FBI weaponized Twitter to violate the 1st amendment’ to ‘NGO’s are weaponizing the FBI and other executive agencies against their political opposition.’ Parker’s voice, information and concerns were well received, so much so that in the process now are at least 130 solutions.
Solutions to what?
Armed with affidavits and direct evidence from the explosive Wooten whistleblowing document, as well as from mothers who’ve been politically targeted in Chattanoogah, Tenn. (search: Wooten memo for a deep dive), key staff members of both political parties were made aware of what has quickly become a national emergency for parents and children alike. Parker believes — in fact, it’s his ongoing message and approach — that the way to proceed with these monolithic political issues is through policy.
Flashback
Nearly a decade after the controversial Bundy Ranch standoff of 2014, the statute of limitations has now been lifted and those wronged by the alleged misconduct of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), among others, have a fresh chance to be heard again with clean, clear and concrete evidence. That this evidence and exposition has made it to Capitol Hill is groundbreaking. Now being discussed by policymakers is what many already knew was a direct disregard for human rights to those involved in the standoff as well as those adjacent, many of whom call Idaho home.
Perhaps most concerning, though, is the SPLC and BLM’s alleged involvement in extraordinary misconduct and constitutional infringement on the American public by weaponizing various organizations against families in specific.
Let’s talk
To be clear, weaponization is the key term here. Parker presented members of the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government with salient details proving organizational overreach with the potential link to nongovernmental organizations (NGO). In other words, these organizations are allegedly using loopholes to go after political opponents through, among other means, families via the school system.
While the weaponization of social media and Twitter, or ‘X,’ as it is now being rebranded, embellished and retooled, is alarming … it goes much, much deeper. The evidence presented by Parker alleges a multifaceted orchestration of derelictions of duty and constitutional infringements by local and federal agencies allowing outside influence to manipulate the political system. What outside influence? Again, allegedly NGOs. These alleged abdications of jurisdiction to foreign influence have reverberated through the system to produce an apparatus that every person must become aware of.
As is typical in intraorganizational corruption, actual facts and the proceedings of agencies’ organizations are mired in vague terminology that obfuscate outright unlawful conduct.
Among many alleged manipulations and defenestrations of jurisdictional responsibility, the most concerning for the citizens of Idaho, in specific, and the United States of America, in general, are those that involve the weaponization of Federal agencies against each other to ultimately collect ambiguous data on parents and children. Is this a drill? What do you think?
It is incumbent on policymakers to make policy. Policy involves oversight into the jurisdiction of elected officials at every level but perhaps more precisely, local officials to act within their local charters. This is a violation of individual human rights — constitutional rights. Lawyers are involved and evidence has been presented and relationships are now in place to, as Parker said, “influence policymakers to influence the policy.”
“We have to start to look at these vague terms … language like domestic terrorism as a charge, as code, as a crime, we need to really seriously evaluate that definition … re-evaluating Congressional Acts … and there has to be oversight. This is a BIPARTSAN issue and we must approach it from both sides.” – Parker
It’s interesting to note that Eric Parker was suddenly booted from Twitter (X) after providing this evidence in Washington, D.C. Was it just the “algorithm?”
The key to all of this is to remember that it is not about either party. The alleged infringements affect every party, citizen, mother, father, daughter, and son.
The degree of the alleged misconduct is outside the scope of this first installment; however, watch this space for further proceedings.
