{"id":18123,"date":"2022-06-15T00:30:29","date_gmt":"2022-06-15T00:30:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/?p=18123"},"modified":"2022-06-14T19:09:52","modified_gmt":"2022-06-14T19:09:52","slug":"he-sued-she-sued","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/index.php\/2022\/06\/15\/he-sued-she-sued\/","title":{"rendered":"He Sued, She Sued"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"p1\"><em><span class=\"s1\">By Eric Valentine<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"p2\"><span class=\"s1\">T<\/span><span class=\"s1\">urd-gate. That news, wherein it seemed apparent the defendant left her poop in the plaintiff\u2019s bed, was the first sign Depp v. Heard was more than a defamation\u2014or defecation\u2014case between two celebrities. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Next came romance; specifically, questions about whether mega-star and mega-pint-drinking actor Johnny Depp and his amicable, bright, attractive female lawyer Camille Vasquez, from the law firm Brown Rudnick, were\u2014or soon would be\u2014romantically involved. It really did look like there was a special affinity between the two, but both have publicly shut that idea down.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Then it got very meta: Was it sexist to assume Depp was dating Vasquez? Would Amber Heard\u2019s poor showing damage the #MeToo movement? Was anyone siding with Depp, just a misogynist out to dismiss claims of unfair patriarchy? When Saturday Night Live spoofs a trial during its so-called cold open, a cultural something beyond law is on trial instead. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>#MeTwo-Million<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">By the time Facebook Reels of Depp-Heard trial content had gone viral again and again, the jury found that both sides defamed one another, and that Heard\u2019s did much more effectively than Depp\u2019s. She now owes her ex $15 million, he owes her two. Neither are completely off the hook when it comes to future court cases or career paths, but since public opinion seems overwhelmingly in favor of Depp, it\u2019s Depp who\u2019s positioned to recover fastest and best.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">In any toxic relationship, it\u2019s impossible to know\u2014or even define\u2014who\u2019s at fault and by how much. Yet, instinctively, we assume there is at least a \u201cprimary aggressor,\u201d and in Depp v. Heard it became obvious to the jury and the public it was Heard who landed that starring role. For some, this proves the whole patriarchy theory and for others it reveals an equality wherein not only women are the victims of abuse. So who\u2019s got it right?<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p6\"><span class=\"s1\"><b>Seeing Heard<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Acting is reacting, so it is said. And the best performances are those in which an actor can dig deeply inside themselves, find a truth, recall the visceral emotion of that truth, and articulate it authentically within the setting and the script that was given. Acting may be pretending, but it is not lying. On the witness stand\u2014and not in the alleged blacklist of Depp et al.\u2014is where Heard has likely forfeited what was potentially a successful career. Also, here is where Depp opened a treasure trove of talent that once inspired and now may have revived his brilliant career. At the very least, it restored his reputation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Not that the reputation was all good. In the UK, Depp had even lost a similar case largely due to the judge having no reason not to believe Heard felt in danger of her life. So how the heck did he win so resoundingly in the U.S.? <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Partly, it\u2019s because the suit in Britain was against a publication. The suit in Virginia was against Heard herself. But more so the victory was due to Depp\u2014a three-time Oscar nominee and twice-named People magazine\u2019s Sexiest Man Alive\u2014doing things on the stand Heard could not or would not do.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p5\">\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Here\u2019s a quicklist:<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p7\"><span class=\"s1\">Took accountability\u2014Depp did not gloat about nor deny his issues with alcohol and drugs. Rather, he acknowledged their role in his struggles and their lack of role, too. Heard did the opposite; everyone else was wrong, mistaken, or lying. Her slips of tongue in some instances would have made Sigmund Freud blush.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p7\"><span class=\"s1\">Showed authenticity\u2014A heavily tattooed, ponytailed man in dark shades wearing chunks of mannery is hardly the picture of authenticity. But for an eccentric like Depp\u2014who shows signs of Asperger\u2019s syndrome, which often acts as vessel and muse for extraordinary brilliance intellectually and creatively\u2014donning his fashionable and unique wardrobe was a statement of honesty. Heard did the opposite; dressing as if Plain Jane was hired on as her new stylist.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p7\"><span class=\"s1\">Told his truth\u2014No one but Depp and Heard know the actual truth, but when communicating his side of the story, you don\u2019t have to be a misogynist to believe Depp over Heard. That\u2019s because human communication has a finite number of ways it occurs and definitive gestures and tones and syntax that cluster together when we speak our truth and when we try to deceive. Depp\u2019s answers, while sometimes even sarcastic toward Heard\u2019s lawyers, were pensive and deliberate and labored and slow; even flawed. But they came from a personal space within Depp, indicated by his body language, which focused internally. Heard did the opposite; she faced the jury when answering the lawyers, forced her facial expressions to denote sadness and painful memory, and shifted focus to elements that just don\u2019t matter (dirty carpets, her dog that stepped on a bee, etc.). <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"p4\"><span class=\"s1\">Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, in conclusion, the fate of actress and model Heard does not matter so much to any movement seeking equality or justice for women or for the abused. That\u2019s because of role models like Camille Vasquez, who is not some actor\u2019s sexy sidekick, but rather a formidable lead attorney who just painted a masterpiece right in front of our eyes. Not only did it win her client\u2019s case, it won her a promotion, too. The CEO of Brown Rudnick announced Vasquez is the newest partner in their renowned law firm.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Eric Valentine Turd-gate. That news, wherein it seemed apparent the defendant left her poop in the plaintiff\u2019s bed, was the first sign Depp v. Heard was more than a defamation\u2014or defecation\u2014case between two celebrities. Next came romance; specifically, questions about whether mega-star and mega-pint-drinking actor Johnny Depp and his amicable, bright, attractive female lawyer [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":18124,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","_pvb_checkbox_block_on_post":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18123","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-commentary"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18123","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18123"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18123\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18125,"href":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18123\/revisions\/18125"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/18124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18123"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18123"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/woodriverweekly.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18123"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}